🔗 Share this article

We are in Black History Month in the Britain, and it appears it’s time for a rethink. Over the years, an event that was initiated as a commemorative event of heritage, traditions and links between international African diaspora communities, has taken on a corporate feel, expanding to include gatherings where individuals of African heritage are compensated to speak with white audiences about implicit prejudice and “allyship”. The 2020s Black Lives Matter protests created a surge in the enterprise of displaying cultural sensitivity. Yet, that phase is now over. The surge has peaked, producing a diluted aftermath of what promoting consciousness is for.

The History of Black History Observance

First commemorated in the US and Canada, Black History Month was created in 1962 as “Negro History Week” by historian of African descent Carter G. Woodson with a week of commemoration and observance in the February's second week. Black History Month developed from this movement and was publicly established in 1970. Currently it is marked not only in the North America in February, but also in autumn in the Britain, Germany, the Republic of Ireland and the the Kingdom of the Netherlands.

The period has transformed since those days, placing less emphasis on the histories of colonial slavery and fights for racial justice, and greater focus on influential individuals of color in politics, culture, and activism, and extensively acknowledging the input Black people have made to influence the nation. It is in learning environments where Black History Month is most regularly observed, with lectures and artistic activities. But the manner the observance is observed is a manifestation of the contemporary political context. How it evolves is a valuable example in how co-option leads to weakening: the reshaping of Black History Month has hindered the objective of it, which is to address structural and organizational discrimination.

---

A Troubling Time

Little demonstrates how important it is to rethink Black History Month as much as the specific period in which it occurs this year. In the Britain, a resurgent right in the guise of the Reform political group is ahead in surveys. In the warmer months we observed the biggest extreme right demonstration in British history. Kemi Badenoch, the person of color at the helm of the Tory party, is a staunch adversary of the racial justice movement, and we are in a position where a member of parliament feels empowered to declare that “not seeing any white faces” in specific city neighborhoods is a cause for alarm. Simultaneously, far-right parties are surging in the European continent as a complete entity.

In the United States, a colossal assault against diversity initiatives and positive discrimination has been carried, often successfully, to the highest courts of the nation. A effort to remove the history of people of color and narrative from the archives is ongoing. One of the political figure's initial presidential directives targeted the National Museum of African American History and Culture, and the prestigious establishment, accusing them of a “concerted and widespread effort to change the national past” by representing the nation “as naturally discriminatory”.

In this context, the observance symbolises how minimally it can be effective if it is limited to either dutiful corporate observances, or depoliticized celebrations of contributions in the past, rather than confronting the situation of the contemporary world. It also shows how its restricted time span means that it is detached from the broader ongoing work that is required. Denise Miller, a educator at University of Greenwich, put it best when she raised concerns about the short-term symbolic gestures of the celebration. “The problem with taking a tokenistic approach”, she wrote, “is that it often means that Black History Month becomes a fleeting performance rather than a driver of transformation.”

---

Reevaluating, Not Abandoning

Determining how to adapt, revise and extend initiatives for fair treatment and appreciation in such times of discouragement and concern is a difficult task. There is a urge to just do away with observances such as Black History Month completely, assuming they are inadequate for current needs, or are vestiges of an time that has been ineffective.

But despite everything, Black History Month, and in fact the complete comprehensive structure and tradition of activism for racial justice – community-based BLM initiatives, inclusion and equity efforts, and certainly, even commercial engagements – represent an framework that a considerable labor has gone into. It is there not just to decay as the political landscape shifts (and in fact, declines), but to be a vital organism.

So what would a fresh vibrant Black History Month appear as? Well, first, it would be extended beyond a brief observance: something that is dispersed throughout the annual calendar (as some institutions are already beginning to do), elements of its material (particularly around notable African descendants) integrated into academic syllabi. It would also be a time that does not evade politics, and provides room for individuals, particularly the younger generation, to air their fears and experiences. What purpose serves mere awareness of the history when it fails to address the contemporary truth of far-right rallies in the urban areas? Institutions who celebrate it should not be comforted with the neutral terminology of hidden discrimination and sensitivity to “microaggressions”, but faced with the dangers that impact society if fight against prejudice is not approached earnestly. To summarize, Black History Month should be made contemporary, critical, and adaptive. Maybe an total re-identification is necessary – Present-Day African Heritage Celebration.