Exploring The Four Spent the Day Together from Chris Kraus β An Iconic Writer Explores Something New
The Four Spent the Day Together features protagonists seeking fresh starts, trying to break free from drugs or harmful partnerships, only to witness hope devolve into conflict. The author frequently uses the phrase "new beginning", transforming it into deliberately jaded through its repetitions. Sentences like "He could make a fresh start" and "They decided to make a fresh start" appear throughout the text. And yet, Kraus herself seems to be making her individual reinvention, since this presents as a novel form of writing β observational, genuinely novelistic. However it reveals itself to be packed with the familiar conflicts and aesthetics as her previous works.
From Unplanned Author to Iconic Work
Kraus was originally an creative who transitioned to writing almost accidentally with her 1997 cult classic I Love Dick, made up of letters to an unreceptive lover, converting confessional female writing from self-debasement into assassination. She continued writing, but the next trio of compelling and abrasive novels did not possess the power and directness that the letter form brought to the voice of I Love Dick. It didn't help was her position as a nonconformist creator who had turned into a extensive real estate holder, so there was significant attention on housing investments. It follows that she presently aims to experiment with fresh narrative sources, looking outwards to the experiences of others, at a period in which she claims that contemporary political climate renders personal narrative obsolete.
Multiple Generations, One Unescapable Past
The Four Spent the Day Together is divided into three sections, spanning multiple eras β none able to break free from their histories. There is the narrative about Emma and Jasper, representations of Kraus's parents, relocating from the New York borough to rural Connecticut. Then there is the narrative of the author, in the guise of protagonist Catt Greene, confronting the delayed acclaim of I Love Dick, the ascent of a political figure, and her addict husband her husband Paul. The third thread involves the narrative of a homicide of one lost young man by another in a town mostly forsaken by forward-thinking policies only a short distance from Catt's cottage in the Minnesota countryside.
As a reader drawn to polished prose of the type Kraus tends to eschew, I was captivated by the narrative style of the first section.
As a reader who appreciates crafted language of the kind that Kraus tends to eschew, I was won over by the novelistic voice of the first section. It exhibits a new quality of attentiveness that allows space for minutiae, like the bucket that the youthful Catt pries out of frozen water at the start of the story, aided by her beloved father. "I found an ice toy!" she says; "a nice toy", he replies, "the nuanced interpretations of terms circulating in their speech like sweet treats". The author narrates Emma's story with inquiry and familiarity. "Emma experienced a dreamlike sensation β not precisely her dream."
Frustration and Disruption
I was bound to become frustrated when I expected this different style could last out the book. Kraus notes here that she is annoyed by the satisfaction those who appreciate polished prose have gotten from I Love Dick; she's committed to fragmentation, to the untidy aesthetics she shares with her hero writer Kathy Acker, and the emptiness and redundancy of her previous novels reasserts itself in the central part. Catt Greene is attempting to do up 36 run-down apartments in Albuquerque's worst neighbourhoods while moving between the Midwest and the West Coast, unable to aid Paul curb his addiction. She feels helpless as Paul cycles through low-resource employment as an recovery specialist in a society propelled by the anger and fear that underpins a political win. There are several pages about the protagonist facing cancellation on Twitter, her occupation changed from "writer" to "real estate holder" on the online encyclopedia. The author still appears to care a little too much about this. In a moment she states that she's investigating the murder so that before departing the state, "she may grasp something about an America that her online critics would fail to comprehend, would overlook entirely".
The Homicide Account
Thus we arrive to the actual killing β and the referenced day passed by the deceased with the killer and his friends. The author possesses excellent raw material, and details moment by moment what transpired when the victim Brandon came to meet Brittney after meeting her on an app where she marketed explicit images. He was hoping for sex but seems amiably to have occupied the day with her companions, loitering fixing his automobile and funding treats and narcotics, before being killed by gunfire by Brittney's partner a man named Micah β a young, mentally ill man who has often been institutionalized for fits of anger.
Fascination and Incompletion
The protagonist becomes fixated by the account, and I was fascinated by the way that Kraus's dual urges towards accurate chronicling and daring boundary-pushing wrestle in this part. Yet I wished her to go further into her individual preoccupations here. The compelling persona is Brittney herself, who becomes vivid in part due to the protagonist's connection to her β a similarly gifted, tormented individual spiraling out of control in a struggling, neglected community. Kraus tells us that Catt converses with Brittney in jail, but she fails to enact these dialogues. This entire part feels oddly unfinished, to the degree that her narrative ends almost mid-par